Understand an update
Help people find the rule, its date and their next step.
See the public updates ↗BANKS · GOVERNMENT · ORGANISATIONS
Bring your team.
Build something useful.
Banks, government teams and organisations are welcome. Tell us what matters to your people. We can shape one useful property-information pilot together.
Discuss a pilotExplore ways to grow with W
Download the pilot brief ↗
Blank discussion template · text file · 3 October 2026
01 · Share your brief.
02 · Shape one useful pilot.
03 · Review the next step.Begin with public sources and fictional test cases.
02 · Shape one useful pilot.
03 · Review the next step.Begin with public sources and fictional test cases.
Where we can start.
Plan a property journey
Test a clear checklist for one audience and one state.
Explore the free property plan ↗Scope a local project
Define the location, responsibilities and evidence needed.
See the developer pathway ↗Examples to scope together. These are proposed tests, not reported institutional results.
Before we start.
Choose one useful result
Pick one audience, one state and one task. Agree the deliverable, limits and what would make the trial worth continuing.
For example, test whether someone can find the right official property source and explain their next step. Agree the current problem, sample, timing, budget and stop conditions.
Name the people responsible
Agree your sponsor and decision maker, plus W’s delivery lead and source reviewer, before work starts.
Record who owns scope, handles questions, reviews sources, escalates a problem and decides the result. Availability and responsibilities are agreed for each project. An enquiry is not an appointment or service contract.
Set the information boundary
Use public sources and fictional cases for early evaluation. Keep client and resident records out of this public form.
The form stores your business contact and general brief, and uses the disclosed email provider to notify W. Before confidential-data work, agree collection, purpose, access, hosting, retention and removal. A name-free real case may still identify someone.
Read how enquiries are handled ↗ · Privacy-impact assessment guidance ↗
Confirm the buying requirements
Ask your procurement team which process and evidence applies. Confirm the supplying entity, relevant licences, insurance, scope, total cost and terms.
A bank assesses its proposed arrangement; Commonwealth entities, state agencies and councils have different buying frameworks. A small trial still needs the required approvals. Supplier approval and a contract are established through that process.
The official references below apply to their named buyers; they are not W certifications.
Measure, review and decide
Agree how to test usefulness and accessibility. Review the evidence before continuing, correcting or stopping.
Possible measures include successful tasks, finding the correct state and official source, understanding the next action and access issues. Record the test method and sample. Fix serious confusion or safety issues before expanding.
A lender’s education team could test a fictional buyer’s source and next lender question. A council team could test a fictional renter’s safe official repair hand-off. These tests do not process loan applications, resident case files or professional decisions.
Prepare the evaluation questions ↗ · Inclusive-design guidance ↗ · Measuring and improving guidance ↗
START A CONVERSATION
Tell us the outcome.
We’ll discuss the path.
A general brief, location and approximate scale are enough to start.
Your brief is saved for W to review. Scope, responsible people, availability and next steps are agreed separately. Keep confidential documents outside this form.